Comments on: TwinNote AudioVisualizer https://twinnote.clairnote.org/blog/2011/01/twinnote-audiovisualizer/ A better music notation system Fri, 01 Nov 2013 01:52:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6.1 By: TwinNote Blog — Fine-Tuning TwinNote, Part One https://twinnote.clairnote.org/blog/2011/01/twinnote-audiovisualizer/#comment-11 Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:24:12 +0000 http://twinnote.org/blog/?p=116#comment-11 […] January as I was working on the new AudioVisualizer home page I realized that what I had been calling the “Max 6-6″ version of TwinNote […]

]]> By: Paul Morris https://twinnote.clairnote.org/blog/2011/01/twinnote-audiovisualizer/#comment-10 Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:58:56 +0000 http://twinnote.org/blog/?p=116#comment-10 I’m not a legal expert, but my understanding is that alternative notation systems are not considered authored works (like creative works of art or written works) so are not covered by copyright protection.

It may be possible to patent an alternative notation system as an invention. Some have or have tried, but it is not clear whether those patents would hold up if legally challenged. I have not filed for a patent on TwinNote, and do not have plans to do so.

Legal matters aside, my approach is that I want TwinNote to be free from any encumbrance that might hinder its use. If someone uses it for something other than private use, then attribution and a link to the TwinNote website would be appreciated.

Note that the content of the TwinNote *website* is licensed under a creative commons license. But that does not cover the TwinNote notation system itself.
http://twinnote.org/about/index.html#creativecommons

]]> By: C.J. Wang https://twinnote.clairnote.org/blog/2011/01/twinnote-audiovisualizer/#comment-9 Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:29:56 +0000 http://twinnote.org/blog/?p=116#comment-9 Is TwinNote in public domain?

]]>